This past weekend I visited a cash transfer project I hinted at in my previous blog. I like the idea of cash transfer, money going directly to the people who need it, who can decide how it will be used. The people who received it were so grateful. While having lost homes and loved ones, they are trying to move forward by investing in a small business selling candy, buying bulk drinks to sell on the street, or paying back loans. Yes, to a man/woman interviewed, they were all paying back "loans".
You have to understand that the concept of money here is much different than in western societies. Community is very important. When someone is in need, it is the responsibility of the community to help out as they are able. These informal loans are sure to be remembered when the "debtor" unexpectedly finds him/herself with cash on hand. Those who have should share with those who don't.
This concept of money has interesting implications in business or humanitarian assistance. If money is intended for a particular project, but a more urgent need arises, should not the money be redirected to where it is needed most? If a truck delivering aid is ambushed and police request some of the cargo to ensure safe passage, is it alright because they are also in need? (This happened here to MCC, and the national workers were far less outraged than the international workers.) Why should this not be acceptable? There are many communities in the world who think there is nothing wrong with situations like this.
A community based concept of money has its drawbacks, making it difficult for individuals to get ahead and improve their lot. Yet what a contrast with the self-absorption and profit taking of individuals and corporations in developed countries who use donations to promote themselves and satisfy their egocentric notions of how their donations should be put to use.
2 comments:
glevaIs Haiti considered a socialist country because of the value system you describe? Is there a lot of protection money or goods being paid out to various groups such as the police - how can any of that be regulated if there are no paper trails for impulse or unplanned giving even though it may well be meeting legitimate needs. Have you observe hoarding by certain groups or is there genuine concern and care for each other?
I'd like to respond to the last comment on my blog. Let me say, first of all, that it's my intention just to make you think and not to propose one type of system over another. I'm certainly not a specialist in this area. I don't think you would call this a socialist system, which I believe would be equality imposed by the state.
Like any system, there will be some who abuse the goodwill of others, and others who comply grudgingly. However, I do feel there is a lot of genuine concern towards each other.
As far as regulation and paper trails? From a state perspective, I don't believe that is high on their list of priorities right now. From a business or humanitarian perspective, I'm not sure how well they document the receipt of goods by beneficiaries...something to think about.
Thanks for your questions!
Post a Comment